FRANKLIN AND STERLING HILL NEW JERSEY: THE WORLD'S MOST MAGNIFICENT MINERAL DEPOSITS
HOME MINERAL INDEX SEARCH LINKS BIBLIOGRAPHY INTRODUCTION CULTURAL ASPECTS LOCAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGY OF THE ZINC DEPOSITS
GEOCHEMISTRY FLUORESCENCE THE MINERAL ASSEMBLAGES LISTS OF MINERALS DESCRIPTIVE MINERALOGY NESOSILICATES
SOROSILICATES AND CYCLOSILICATES INOSILICATES PHYLLOSILICATES TECTOSILICATES AND SILICATES OF UNKNOWN STRUCTURE
ELEMENTS SULFIDES ARSENIDES ANTIMONIDES AND SULFOSALTS OXIDES AND HYDROXIDES HALIDES AND CARBONATES
SULFATES BORATES TUNGSTATES AND MOLYBDATES ARSENATRES ARSENIDES PHOSPHATES AND VANADATES UNNAMED MINERALS


SINGLE-CHAIN SILICATES

The pyroxene group

AEGIRINE

AUGITE

DIOPSIDE

HEDENBERGITE

JOHANNSENITE

PETEDUNNITE  

The pyroxenoid group

BUSTAMITE

MARSTURITE

PECTOLITE

PYROXMANGITE

RHODONITE

WOLLASTONITE

XONOTLITE


DOUBLE-CHAIN SILICATES


The amphibole group

ACTINOLITE

CUMMINGTONITE

EDENITE

FERROACTINOLITE

HASTINGSITE

HORNBLENDE

MAGNESIOHORNBLENDE

MAGNESIORIEBECKITE

PARGASITE 

RICHTERITE

TIRODITE

TREMOLITE


Other inosilicates

GAGEITE-2M and GAGEITE-1Tc

 

DOUBLE-CHAIN SILICATES

The amphibole group

The amphibole minerals from Franklin and Sterling Hill are varied and numerous, and Palache (1935) provided much morphological data. Many amphiboles occur within the surrounding Franklin Marble and the local gneisses. The nomenclature of amphiboles has undergone much evolution in the last half-century; the nomenclature used here is that of the IMA-approved system published by Leake (1978). Although limited in scope, the best extant study of amphiboles from the Franklin orebody is that of Klein and Ito (1968).              

In general, most amphiboles from the ore deposit at Franklin are calcic amphiboles; actinolite and tremolite are the most common of these, and most are manganese- and zinc-bearing. Many other amphiboles are also present; tirodite, an Mn-Mg species, and the most significant of these, is relatively uncommon, perhaps because of the abundance of calcium in orebody assemblages. The amphiboles from both Franklin and Sterling Hill require much more study. Amphibolite rocks to the west of Franklin and Sterling Hill were studied by Collins (1971), with a judicious eye on their Mn and Zn contents.

Pargasite, edenite, magnesiohornblende, pargasitic hornblende, and edenitic hornblende are all present in the Franklin-Sterling Hill area. They closely occupy adjacent compositional space and can be identified as to formal species only by use of full chemical analyses. There are very few studied specimens for comparison.

For these reasons, the writer suggests ambiguous light-colored amphiboles from the marble quarries be called “pargasite;” those of light color to medium green or brown color from calcic assemblages in the orebodies be called “tremolite” or “actinolite;” and ambiguous very dark-colored amphiboles from the ore deposits be called “hornblende,” pending chemical analyses. For those amphibole specimens which lack even these general characteristics, the best name designation is the general one, amphibole. The amphiboles found in the Franklin-Sterling Hill area are listed below.

Actinolite

Cummingtonite

Edenite

Ferroactinolite

Hastingsite

Hornblende

Magnesiohornblende

Magnesioriebeckite

Pargasite

Richterite

Tirodite

Tremolite

 

FOOTER LBI

 
Copyright © 1995 by Pete J. Dunn
Website by Herb Yeates
 
Link to homepage
This page created: January 13, 2001

 

CHAPTER 17. INOSILICATES